Modern Science

     The origin of futuristic knowledge is traced back in a period of rapid scientific evolvement in Europe in the years 1500-1700 called scientific revolution. The initial step of its elaboration was the Copernican revolution which placed the riveted earth at the point of the universe with the sun and planets in orbit around it (Okasha, 2002).The innovation led to development of hedendaags physics which had discoveries that the planets do not revolve in orbits but ellipses (p.3).Scientists like Galileo were proficient to first show mathematics language which described the behavior of actual objects in the material world(Okasha,2002).Such principles and others developed according to history are carried to steady and are useful in claiming and proofing scientific theories.
Modern science is characterized by determinism according to research psychologists (Myers,).One of the aspects is meet of empirical data. Modern scientists describe the order that exists in the universe in a systematic way of collecting observable data. They advocate for systematic observation including classification of naturally occurring events (p.12).The data is again verificatory or disapproved through investigation. Modern discipline is again characterized by seeking unrestricted principles where scientists go beyond bare observations to propose theories that explain structure. The principles or theories are tested to predict results which form the corner stone of science where they are used to explain phenomenon.
Another feature of au courant science is critical thinking which involves systematic, objective and rational interpretation of data (Myers,).The scientists don’t allow their personal beliefs or anticipations to influence their observations or conclusions(p.14).Emphasis is laid on simplicity, precision and clarity of thoughts by avoiding making unnecessary assumptions to support arguments.
Modern scientists also accept the uncertainty of their conclusions by self-correction (Myer,).They admit that scientific content is flexible to changing cosmic and so amendments in the theories are unavoidable for progress in that the greater the evidence supporting them, the higher the verity of its proposition. Finally, modern science publicizes its results where the scientists, professionals and special interest groups often converge to exchange ideas.
Induction is the opposite of illative which is a process of forming universal propositions. For example, if one needs to ascertain that there is something true about volcanic mountains, one has to confirm it for every specific volcanic mountain precedent ruling out it gone as true. The conclusion cannot be true if the evidence is incomplete. Nieuwerwets science is concerned with discovery of peregrine theories which explain the existing facts and envision new ones (McFarlane, 2002).Scientific knowledge cannot progress if the universal laws are unprovable according to induction. It emphasizes on the need to weed out the unsatisfactory theories which are not easily identifiable. This brings in Popper’s point of a logical asymmetry of verification else falsification of the theories.
Popper argued that falsifiability is a criterion which brings a distinction between science and nonscience. It is the feasibility of rejecting empirical conclusions by rendering every testable universal law as falsifiable. The concept regards everything as criticisable and therefore distinguishes the useful theories from the worthless ones which bring in the emanate of demarcation. The problem finds criterion for distinguishing between empirical sciences, mathematics plus logic. Popper suggests that since scientific theories need to exist tested, then falsifiability is a demarcation between science et alii pseudoscience. The criterion leads to the idea that science develops through a process concerning conjectures und so weiter refutations of testing proposed theories (Mcfarlane, 2002).
Copyright (c) 2013 Morgan D