Society itself is a dynamic system. Several components are there. Human resource is the chief sustaining part. But probe on the human vector only keeping reserved other organic and inorganic aids leads results that are valid for a very temporary period. Chosen must take the vicinal inside account for either social development project. Environment on the other hand involves both physical (like lithosphere, noxious etc) and the social aspects (like socio-economic and cultural habits etc).
Research projects receptacle treffen undertaken at micro or macro level. It is preferable to start with micro one and with selective motto. The findings at the micro point of study may then breathe extended to the macro system keeping the motto intact only with open outlook to have any unique findings so that secondary projects can be undertaken.
A study proletarian must entrench up his perceptible target to start with. The pattern must reflect the gravity in relation to dynamic social developments befitting the need of the time. Topic from research should be aimed at the collection like existing data along with analysis complemented with the suggestions for remedial measures/course about action to live taken via the appropriate authority. The findings/suggestions should help the future planners of the area/country for the betterment of the existing circumstances in the society in that respect. Tokenism should be avoided. Suggestions should obviously keep pace for further research on the same topic from a different angle et al evolve idea for new subjects of research.
Many theoretical models have been followed by the social scientists. Attempts would be taken for help from any or some of the models wherever suitable.
Keeping all these in mind a researcher after selecting his/her topic should collect data on the previous homologous works, schoolwork of theoretical models assuming there be any and pinpoint his/her area of work. A researcher in this rapidly changing acculturation environment (e., g., rapid urbanization repression on women. increase in the faith ratio male/female etc).All these can be cited around an instance as guide for a researcher as ‘demo’.
1.Collection of data with questionnaire or by any other rule and views from earlier works on similar topic.
2. Analogy connective explanation regarding findings. Possible or may nay be with graphical representations.
3. Superiority of the mode of ponder amidst reasons.
Summarisation of the Findings and the opinions gathered. Critical expository and suggestions. etc etc,
Finding the right person!
Unsure of what the future brings us, fresh and full about hopes and dreams, we promotion into the difficult life concerning dating and relationships without any experience. And then, based only on what we feel, we think the right partner is the person that gives us the biggest thrill, the one that first makes us feel an impossible to fight attraction.
So our first experiences of love are physical, and they can’t always be the right choices. Among lots of sad love stories and many more disappointments one can find the acceptable one that makes them complete and safe.
Maybe the word safe turns many hearts away, it likelihood sound wrong to romantic persons, but that is the key that unlock the door to a perfect partner et alii a perfect relationship.
So, to find the right one we have to look penetrating inside ourselves and see what our most intimate desires are. We have to know ourselves at the highest level to discover what faithfully we expect from others. Once we did that, then we are ready to explore, sift the world for the one and if we’re lucky we’ll find our happiness. The first criterion one must rely on is the heart, of course, because where everything is perfect but there’s no love, which is not a relationship, that’s a friendship. Consequently find someone you tenderness and start a relationship. Then, after the first weeks when everything is perfect any matter what, the blindness of love will begin to disappear and you be able to see everything that makes your partner what he/she is: allness the characteristics and all the defects. Putting everything in balance is the key. Here’s where the second criteria comes forward, a criteria that must be based on reason: here you must think hard and discern if you can live forever maybe with the one you love. Most of the times, when nothing is wrong apparently, people go on and on with shallow relationships that become a habit more that a love. You must, above everything, never do that mistake cause if you do you’ll see the truth too late, when many disappointments changed you and made you more bitter in love.
In conclusion, finding the right partner is easy for everyone that knows hoe to use his/hers hearts and mind as one. If we suffer a little when we give up on a amorosity that makes us bad and angry, we’ll be plentifully rewarded when we’ll find out we did a sane choice and that choice was the one that allowed us to meet and keep the right one next to us.